Thursday, June 23, 2016

The brouhaha about bathrooms May 15, 2016

LAS CRUCES – I’m trying my best to understand the brouhaha about bathrooms.
But the recent state, national and possibly even Supreme Court-level hubbub about who’s allowed to go where strikes me as way too much ado about nothing very important, in the grand scheme of things.
Maybe it’s because I grew up in a family of five with three kids, three bedrooms and one bathroom. I was reminded how typical that was, recently, while watching Irene Oliver-Lewis’ new version of her touching and funny “Cecilia-isms: Dichos de mi madre,” a play about growing up with her large, loving, close-knit family.
And you had to be a loving, close-knit family to survive, share and schedule life around one, shared bathroom.
It was not easy. There were issues of territory, privacy, hot water and other pressing matters to be negotiated several times every day. When dates or other special grooming issues were involved, sibling rivalries could surface in dangerous ways. And then there were times of needs for long therapeutic soaks clashing with – how to delicately put this – illness or desperate calls of nature.
In fact, on dark days when the world is too much with me, I have only to look around my little semi-adobe abode to feel instantly better. Most of the time, I have three bedrooms and two whole bathrooms all to myself. Life is working out well.
Then, I hear of laws and nationwide boycotts, all focusing on the whether certain groups should be able to use particular bathrooms.
This is nothing new and the roots of such controversies usually involve some sort of discrimination and fear mongering. The Civil Right Movement focused on segregation that involved schools, housing, transportation, employment and the basics of life, including access to public bathrooms and drinking fountains. 
Those of us old enough to remember the battles during the 1970s over the Equal Rights Amendment may have forgotten that opponents ominously and sometimes downright hysterically threatened that the amendment’s passage would result in, gasp, unisex bathrooms!
I think most women I know would have taken the risk for equality in pay scales. It was the glass ceilings rather than the bathrooms that had the most impact on our lives and careers.
In the meantime, though many seem not to have noticed, the bathroom scene has changed.
When the popular sitcom Ally McBeal (1997-2002) made the unisex bathroom a major plot feature, the concept seemed to generate more amusement than alarm.
In the new millennium, family bathrooms, changing areas and separate, specially-equipped bathrooms or stalls for the differently-abled became common, and sometimes required by building code upgrades.
As a cautious, if not helicopter, mom and grandmom of boys, I learned there are fairly simple ways to safeguard your kids. Take them with you when they’re little and stay observant when they’re old enough to go to the men’s (or women’s if you’re the caretaker dad of daughters) bathroom themselves. 

But I think it would be nice if the whole world would agree on unisex bathrooms for all, whether multi-stall, a cluster of single restrooms, or some combination thereof. (And it would solve many practical problems, including the much longer stadium lines for the ladies’ room.)
There would likely be a civilizing, family-friendly atmosphere that would discourage any of the behaviors, however statistically rare, that loom large in the paranoid fantasies of some of our citizens.
And that civil ambience, in these ever-more-divisive times, might remind us of the things unite us. We’re all human beings, and when you gotta go, you gotta go. And, just as we did as families with limited facilities, to keep peace and for the common good, we must learn to negotiate on a daily basis to work things out.

S. Derrickson Moore may be reached at 575-541-5450, dmoore@lcsun-news.com or @derricksonmoore on Twitter.

No comments: